Trekking into POTA Heaven: Wrinkly Face Provincial Park Activation

Many thanks to Jeff (VE7EFF) who shares the following guest post:


2.5 km Trek into Wrinkly Face Provincial Park, BC, CA-4307

by Jeff (VE7EFF)

My goal this summer is to do more backpacked-in POTA activations. This is my 3rd POTA outing over the past week.  Being in Canada, I don’t have much time left this season to do this before the weather turns too wet, cold or snowy for my liking.

I attempted to activate Wrinkly Face Provincial Park, CA-4307 last summer.  However, I couldn’t get there because the FSR forestry service road was washed out about halfway to the park.  My Subaru Forester is an amazing SUV on outback FSR roads, but this washout was too much to even attempt.

So, this year I decided to attempt to hike to the park on foot which turned out to be a 2.5 km trek with about 653 ft elevation gain.  As always, my wife Alexis (VE7LXE) is my travel companion.

Our trailhead starts about an hour’s drive north of Kelowna, BC which is where we live.  We park on the side of a gravel road near the trailhead. We will be following a 2.5 km segment of the Okanagan High Rim Trail, which will take us to our destination in the middle of Wrinkly Face Provincial Park.

We aren’t sure exactly where the trail starts from here.  But just around the corner ahead of the car, is an adjoining FSR road. Here we find a sign and map of the Okanagan High Rim Trail (OHRT).

A closer look at the sign shows the OHRT trail starts near the sign.  I have circled our starting point and ending point on the map photo, marked in yellow.  (We ended up setting down about midway in Wrinkly Face Prov. Park.)   So, off we go.

We found the trail!

Apparently, there was a heavy rain downpour early this morning. So, the trail is quite soggy and damp for most of the trek up.  It’s also feeling quite cold this morning.  We actually felt the need to put gloves on.

The beginning of the trail is a steady uphill trod.  However, it also crosses a couple of FSR roads, which gives us some flat areas to walk on.  While most of the trail is well marked with small markers, there were a few areas where we got off track for a short distance and had to backtrack.  There are also free-range cows up here and they tend to create their own network of trails which often crisscross the OHRT trail, which causes periodic confusion as to which one for us to follow.

Thank goodness, I pre-plan these trips on my Garmin GPS and Google Maps to help with navigation.

I don’t think the OHRT trail is very heavily traveled.  In some areas, the pathway is almost overgrown with vegetation.

Along with overgrown vegetation, fallen trees can also create an occasional obstacle.  Often, the trail doesn’t amount to much more than a game trail.

Finally, some open views to the south!  This could be a viable operating area.  One problem though – we haven’t crossed the park boundary yet.  Good news – the sky is starting to clear!  Onwards and upwards…

Making good progress.  We are now crossing into the park boundary.

Welcome to Wrinkly Face Provincial Park, CA-3407.  You won’t find any parking stalls, camp sites, picnic tables, or outhouses here.  But what I do hope to find here is… POTA heaven!

After trekking about halfway into the park, we finally came across an open meadow.  Looks like this could be our POTA ops spot.  In the far distance is a glimpse of Kelowna and part of Lake Okanagan.

It’s nice to finally offload our packs.

Time to start breaking-out my shack-in-the-pack.

My antenna today is an experimental homebrew ½ wave “Vertical Coaxial-Sleeve Dipole”, cut for 20m band.  This is the 1st time I’m deploying this antenna in the field.  I built it the day before specifically for backpack ops.

Typically, I activate with my 20m or 30m center fed dipole, built and sold by N9SAB (excellent portable dipoles).  Dipoles take more time and work to deploy the center feed as well as guying the dipole end wires.  I typically would deploy as a flat dipole or inverted-V.

On the other hand, coaxial sleeve dipoles are typically oriented vertically for omnidirectional propagation.  Today, I’m deploying it as a slightly slanted vertical, perhaps at a 15 or 20 degree angle off vertical center and oriented such that I hopefully maximize propagation to the SE direction, which gives me good coverage of the SE USA from the pacific NW.

While the dipole is physically end-fed, electrically it functions as center-fed dipole, due to the magic of RF skin effect over the first half of the dipole.  I used RG-174 as the medium for the coaxial sleeve dipole. The coax is electrically cut for  ~ ½ wavelength on the 20m band.  The bottom end of the dipole is terminated by a Fair Rite #43 1.4” toroidal core.  This core blocks any RF from traveling back below the toroid towards the transmitter and sets the overall length of the ½ wave dipole above the toroid.  At the apparent center of the RG-174 coax antenna, ¼ wave above the toroid, I separate the shields.  I soldered the upper shield to the coax center conductor to enhance the upper radiator conductor surface area.

The bottom half of the RG-174 coax acts as both a 50-ohm transmission line and as the lower half of a dipole (this results from RF skin effect on the shield outer surface).  For further details, you can Google the topic of coaxial sleeve dipoles.  At the end of the day, we’ll see how it performed…

Time to get the antenna as high as I can into the treetops.

With my trusty Weaver Arborists Throw Bag I have success on the first throw.

I’m guessing that I made it up about 30 ft. or so.

It took a little maneuvering to untangle some of the line from the lower tree branches.

The coaxial sleeve dipole has now been hoisted as high as it can go.  If my support line were up a bit higher, it could operate as a completely vertical dipole.  However, I have it pulled out at about a 30 degree angle towards the SE direction.  This gives me a little higher angle of radiation to the SE, which is what I want. Too low a propagation angle will just be hindered by the nearby mountain tops.

The blue extension transmission line I use to connect to the antenna coax is the equivalent of RG-316.  In this case it is Enviroflex 316, a high quality low-loss small diameter 50 transmission line.  It can be purchased through Digikey.

All the while that I am setting up the antenna system, Alexis is relaxing and enjoying the show.

Time to start calling CQ POTA.  My KX2 power level is set at 8 watts. (Uh-oh, is that QRO?)

This will be my operating position for the next 4.5 hours.

The weather is a mixture of cloud and sun.  When it’s cloudy, it’s cold.  When it’s sunny, it is hot.

As always, I start on 20m and try to bag at least 10 contacts before I move onto 17m and up.

My first 20m contact was made at 17:41 UTC (10:41 PST) with K2UPD in NY.  Not bad for starters.

Over the next 25 minutes I bagged 14 contacts which included NY, CA, NC, NV, TX, CO, MO, OH, and UT.

Then I moved up to 17m.  From 18:37 to 18:45 UTC I bagged 3 more contacts including NM, TX, and CA. Then 17m died (or the 17m hams are taking a siesta).

Next, I move up to 15m.  Only 2 contacts which included TX and LA.

12m and 10m were completely dead.  No action.

Moving back down to 17m.  It has picked up.  Over the next hour, I logged 9 more contacts including TX, FL, CA, OH, ON, MI, and NC.

For my finale, I drop back to 20m and try some P2P contacts.  I picked up 4 P2P contacts including AK, MA, ND, and CA.

After all is said and done, I made a total of 32 contacts over the course of about 4.5 hours.  The coaxial sleeve dipole at least seems to work and get the job done.  How well is hard to say.  But it does function.

I don’t rush through my activations. After all, it’s a lot of work to get up here.  I try to get as much airtime in as I can before the trek back to the car.

All in all, it appears I was able to cover most the USA from coast to coast, including Alaska.  As always, 20m is the bread-and-butter band with 17m and 15m as the gravy bands.

Now it’s time for the trek back to the Subaru Forester.

We hope you enjoyed reading about our POTA backpacked-in activation from Wrinkly Face Provincial Park in southern BC, Canada.

Cheers,

Jeff – VE7EFF and Alexis – VE7LXE

My Equipment List

Note: All Amazon links are affiliate links that support QRPer.com at no cost to you.

12 thoughts on “Trekking into POTA Heaven: Wrinkly Face Provincial Park Activation”

  1. Just great ! Unhappily, we do. Not have here this enthusiasm regarding Qrp POTA, SOTA, IOTA.
    I am looking for a set of UNUN, BALUN very small, maybe a BNC connector but there’s no option.
    The freight from USA or CA costs 3 times the product …

    1. I feel your pain, Luiz.
      Every time I make an online purchase from the USA (and most of my ham/electronics purchases do come from the US) I despair over the cost. After converting USD to CAD, then astronomical shipping cost, plus tax and plus brokerage fees we pay almost double for everything we buy here. That is part of the joy of living in Canada 🙂
      Jeff – VE7EFF

  2. Great account Bob, Alanna. Nice to see a POTA activation being done by backpacking in, my preferred method too. Operating from a vehicle in a parking lot just doesn’t compare with the fun and exercise we get from operating out in the Big Blue Sky Shack.

    1. Thank you for your comments, John.
      This is my first year of real backpacking POTA ops and I really cherish those outings. I love adventure and exploring the less-traveled outback areas. I don’t think I’ll be physically able to do this kind of thing much longer, so I’m doing it now while I still can.

      Many of the Ecological Reserves and Protected Areas here in BC are quite remote and are only accessible via vehicle, so most of my past activations have been operating outside next to or near my Subaru Forester. It’s still in remote areas where we rarely see another soul. I love being in those settings of remoteness, away from it all.
      That said, as the weather gets colder and wetter, I will likely find myself operating from inside the car, now and then.
      (I really don’t like cold weather; ….. I know, how unCanadian is that 🙂

  3. The impedance at the feedpoint where the coax shield is split is very high on 10 m, since the effective length is one full wave. This leads to very high SWR and resulting high loss on the coax feedline. I’m not surprised the excellent tuner in the KX2 managed to deal with the situation, but still you didn’t get all that much RF into the radiating part of the antenna.

    To a lesser extent the same is true on 12 m. By the time you get to 15 m the antenna is about 3/4 wave long and the SWR though still high has come down a good bit, and even more so on 17 m. So I’m not surprised you didn’t work anyone on 10 m or 12 m and didn’t work all that many stations on 15 m and 17 m.

    Here’s something you might try. Start with a 20 m half wave dipole made 100% out of wire. One end gets suspended from a point high up in a tree. Feed it in the middle with ladder line or better yet open wire balanced line; make the feedline long enough that it slopes down only gradually, making a good angle with the antenna (the closer to 90 degrees, the better). Tilting the antenna by pulling the bottom end away from the transmitter location can increase that angle. Put a 1:1 current balun (choke) at the lower end of the feedline, connect with as short a section of coax as possible to your KX2, and let the KX2’s tuner do its thing. I’ll bet it works a lot better on those higher frequency bands, especially so on 10 m.

    One more thing: You could make the dipole a bit shorter than 1/2 wave on 20 m (maybe 1/2 wave on 17 m or even 1/2 wave on 15 m). It won’t be that much worse on 20 m, and the situation down on the balanced feedline and at the KX2 will be better on the higher bands.

    David VE7EZM

    1. Hi David,
      Many good points regarding operating multiband on a single band dipole. Ideally, one would have a tuned antenna for each band of operation.

      The KX2 and KX3 have amazingly effective antenna tuners for matching detuned antennas. But, for sure, just because the tuner matches to the presented impedance does not guarantee efficient power transfer.
      Operating multiband is almost always a compromise.

      Your suggestion of feeding a wire dipole with a ladder line may certainly be a worthwhile project to try. Experimenting with antennas is half the fun of ham radio!

      Jeff – VE7EFF

  4. Many thanks for this report, Jeff. Many thanks too for yesterday´s qso from CA-3505 on 15 m CW. Also tried to catch your signal later on 12 m, but no propagation into my qth at that time.

  5. Hi Harald,
    Thank you for reaching out and confirming our 15m cw qso from Germany! You are my first Germany POTA contact this year. It’s always exciting for me to make contact with Europe from the pacific northwest in BC, Canada.

    Yesterday, 17m and 15m bands were the hot spots for me. Sorry we couldn’t connect on 12m. 12m was also good to me too with 11 CW contacts, including one in Finland and one in Spain.
    10m was also good to me yesterday with 10 more qso’s, including one in Chile. But, most exciting of all being chased by Thomas K4SWL on 10m !
    (I didn’t know Thomas hung-out on 10m 🙂

    73, Jeff – VE7EFF

    1. I just saw that our 15 m cw contact brought me the “Worked All Provinces in Canada” POTA award. Many thanks again, Jeff 🙂

      vy73
      Harald DL1AX

  6. A comment on the notes by David VE7EZM about using a non resonant doublet with ladder line. One common misconception is that a non resonant antenna will not transfer the full output power , if matched with a tuner. A perfect unit for this is the Elecraft BL2 Balun which is designed for ladder lines and is switchable between 1:1 and 4:1. It’s best to use a length that isn’t resonant, and in fact slightly longer than the lowest frequency/ band you plan to be active on..

    1. All good points, Dan. I look forward to trying out multiband doublets with ladder line next summer.

      In the meantime, I want to do more experimenting with coaxial-sleeve dipoles for deployment simplicity reasons as well as vertically oriented for the upper bands.

      I just finished building 5 separate versions of coaxial sleeve dipoles using RG-316. One for each band including 30m, 20m, 17m, 15m, and 10m bands. My plan is to tune and test each one on its 1/2 wave resonant band first and then see how well I do multiband from 30 – 10m performance wise.

      I know its hard to come to concrete conclusions based on field testing because solar activity has such a huge effect on skywave propagation.

      The weather here is now wet, cold, and soon snowy. It’s not likely I will be doing any outdoor testing until next spring.

      Also on my agenda for next spring, is to test telescopic vertical antennas ground mounted and car mounted; for the times when it isn’t practical to erect a POTA mast, or toss a line into a tree.

      Playing with antennas is where half the fun of ham radio is.

      73, Jeff – VE7EFF

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.