A Xiegu X5105 Field Test by KN3A

I told Thomas I would do my own field test of the Xiegu X5105 doing a couple of Parks on the Air activations and what I thought of the radio.

I have had several radios I’ve used on POTA and SOTA activations over the past year and without a doubt my favorite radio for out in the field is my ICOM IC-705. It has everything I want in a portable radio, however I’m also enjoying it alongside my ICOM IC-7300 in the shack. Therefore I’ve looked at other portable radios for field use.

My latest acquisition was a used Xiegu X5105 that I purchased used on QRZ. The radio works fine and for the most part the menu system with it is very easy to understand. As Thomas has pointed out, the CW memory is absolutely insane to use. It just makes no sense to me why with the 10 memory slots that it’s really impractical to use more than the memory in Slot 1, which for me is the CQ POTA.  I would never even have known how to set it up in the first place without instructions to Tom that was shared in Tom’s post regarding the X5105.

I got the radio on June 3, played around with it in the shack to get familiar with it and programmed in the memories. I went to K-5481 (Wm. Penn State Forest), which has several parts scattered around eastern Pennsylvania. It has a very small 10 acre tract in the Cornwall mountains between Lancaster and Lebanon County, which is also at a SOTA summit. I used my Sotabeams EMCOMM III antenna and turned on the radio to start calling CQ POTA. For the life of me I could not get the CQ message to send, so I gave up on that and used my CW Morse paddle and did it the old fashioned way. I also spotted myself on the cluster and made 3 QSO’s on 40 meters fairly quickly. I had success on 30 and 17 meters as well. In total, there were 10 QSO’s made in about 45 minutes.

Other than my disappointment not being able to easily send the CQ from memory, overall I was pleased with the activation. When I got home I investigated again how to send CW. I also learned how to use the DSP to make it more narrow on CW, which I was thankful for. I then started to see if I could go hands free using my Heil headset that I was able to use when I had the G90. Unfortunately that did not work at all using the AD-1-iCM adapter as it would not transmit with the foot pedal. I did use the Heil headset in the side jack and put the radio in headset mode. I was disappointed to find that I had to increase the volume up the whole way to be able to hear CW loud enough for my old ears. When I unplugged the headset suddenly the radio RX was very loud. (If anyone can offer a solution, please let me know).

Today I took it to my local POTA park near my house, K-1418 (Samuel Lewis State Park). I used the same Sotabeams antenna and was on the air in no time. Band conditions were not so good and I ended up with 18 QSO in just over an hour. It was nice having the CQ function working, however I am used to the interval where it would automatically send every 7 seconds like the IC 705 does. Not a big deal, I just had to press the PTT button on the top.

I never tried using the radio on SSB before so I called unsuccessfully on 20 meters and went to 40 where KM4JEG called me and gave me a 55. Sadly, I had to take my headset off because when I keyed the mic I was hearing my distorted voice through the headset. So, headset was removed. I didn’t expect that was going to happen, so now on SSB, I’m not able to use the headset, at least on TX.

The Good:

I really like the internal battery in the radio. I did not have to bring the Bioenno 12v 3aH battery along. The internal battery works great!

It is very portable. I watched a YouTube video, and unfortunately I cannot find who it was, but they had an Osprey UltraLight Roll Organizer which I purchased on Amazon. This is perfect for storing the X5105 and the few accessories it needs, in my car so I’m always going to have a portable radio available when I travel.

The ATU is great on the radio. I can tune all the bands I want to work with the Sotabeams antenna. This also saves having an extra wire and external ATU like I would have to use on the IC 705 with this type of antenna.

The radio is nice and portable and will store nice in my car when not in use and will be ready to go.

The Bad:

The CW presets are almost worthless and not easy to get to. Once I found how to send from the memories, it only really makes sense to use one of the memory slots. I wouldn’t easily be able to switch to a 73 menu shortcut, then go back to the CQ memory.

With the headset plugged in, when I was transmitting CW, I could hear some distortion while it was sending, however it was not too bad, but something I’m not used to hearing.

The Ugly:

The headset for SSB could not be used at all due to the distorted noise it made. Also, the volume for the headset and the volume through the radio are night and day. As I mentioned before, when I unhooked the headset and the audio came out of the radio again, I had to quickly adjust the volume down.

My Opinion:

Overall, my opinion of the radio is this: For the price and the features it has, I would say it’s a good field radio, as it is easy to store in the car, it has the built in ATU if being used on a random wire antenna, and for 5 watts, people had no problems hearing me, even with poor band conditions and QSB. I hope this radio grows on me, and in the back of my mind don’t find myself thinking during the activation, gee I miss my IC-705 out here.

I know comparing the X5105 to the IC-705 is like comparing apples to oranges. Each radio has it’s good and bad. For the price difference, the Xiegu definitely is worth the price. I would never use it as a first HF radio in the hamshack if I were a new ham. This radio is also not going to be used by me on digital modes. If I want to do digital or work a contest while doing a POTA, then there is no doubt the 705 is coming along for the activation. The Xiegu will be used by me when I want to use a random wire antenna since it has the built in ATU, along with the fact it will be light in the backpack if I am hiking to a summit, and the IC 705 will be used with one of my end-fed half wave antennas or the Hustler vertical array so I don’t need the mAT-705 which I’ll use in the hamshack. I’m trying my best to get away from wires all over the place when I  activate, so the laptop computer is staying home. I really like the HAMRS logging program, which I highly recommend, on my Android Samsung S-20.

If anyone who reads this who has some insight into some of the issues I mention, please reply so I have a better understanding of this radio.

Scott KN3A

Scott Lithgow (KN3A) is a contributor on QRPer.com. Click here to check out his previous posts.

10 thoughts on “A Xiegu X5105 Field Test by KN3A”

  1. I picked up a used x5105 from connect systems. Got $100 off the original price. Have had many qrp rigs since the late 80s. I totally agree with your take on the preset messages. If Xiegu had made the thumbwheel bidirectional for presets, the presets would have been more useful. Other than the preset messages i have no complaints. It has features like the atu, swr sweep built in heat sync and battery system that beats out all the extras needed for the 1k+++ kx line. Imho It’s useless to try to compare it to the 705.
    , a rig thats $1400. There’s too many gadgets in the 705 which I’d never use anyway. I like down to earth qrp in the field. I enjoy doing my pota activations and just setting up on the patio for stuff like yesterday’s SKCC WES Have fun with you new rig. 72 de ke2yk

    1. I agree with you on everything. The x5105 is definitely not a 705. Hope you did well with WES.
      72 de KN3A
      SKCC #: 575T

  2. Scott, I have an IC-705 and use it with an LDG Z-100Plus. How do you set up the 7 second interval on the 705 when calling CQ POTA?

    1. Hi Max….go into CW mode on the IC-705, then Memory/Keyer/Edit-Set/CW-Key Set/(Page 1) Keyer Repeat Time. If you want to contact me, my call is good on QRZ. I hope this helps. 73 Scott

  3. Scott, this is a great field review with excellent points!

    It’s interesting to me also being a KX2, KX3 and IC-705 owner. The X5105 is less refined and the audio is not as good as the other radios, but it has real appeal.

    It feels a bit utilitarian in design: functional, capable, and very practical.

    Like you, mine will pretty much live in the car in a dedicated pack.

    I must say I’m incredibly impressed with the battery life when fully charged.

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts, OM!


  4. Hi Thomas,

    In a previous post you mentioned the front end overload/sensitivity issue that you experienced with the 6100. does the 5105 have this issue as well?

    There is only about $10 difference in price between the 5105 and the 6100. The 5105 has a spectrum analyzer and that is all that is needed for a fied radio. I can forego the waterfall and the color display.

    1. So I haven’t noticed overloading in the X5105. I’m trying to think if I’ve ever actually heard the X5105 overload–I don’t think so. Perhaps someone else can comment here.

      With that said, the audio from the X6100 is marginally better than the X5105. It also has CW and Voice memory keying. The X5105 has CW memory keying, but only one memory position is practical to use int he field. The X6100 is much better in this regard.

      I’m with you, though: I don’t *need* a color screen and spectrum display in the field.

      Again, I hope to produce a video comparing the two radios when I have the time.


  5. I was talking with W4JL the other day after he hiked up Crowders to the Radio towers. I had the same question and asked him if he had ever noticed any overloading. He was in site if the radio towers and he said nothing ever bothered him from making contacts with his 5105.

  6. In the User MSG List you select the message you want to transmit with the Jog Wheel Encoder and Transmit that MSG using XFC on the microphone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.